← Guides & resources

Indie publishing fundamentals

How to Hire (or Skip) an Editor as an Indie Author

A practical guide for indie authors on the different types of editing, when each is worth the investment, how to find and evaluate editors, what to expect from the process, and when self-editing is sufficient.

Editing is one of the most significant investments in a self-published book's quality, and one of the most commonly skipped. The result is a predictable gap between indie books that feel polished and professional and ones that feel rushed: both might have the same story concept, the same cover quality, and the same Amazon listing, but one went through serious editorial work and the other didn't.

This guide explains the types of editing, what each accomplishes, how to find editors, what they cost, how to evaluate them, and when self-editing or skipping a particular type of editing is a reasonable choice.

The four types of editing

Not all editing is the same. Four distinct services operate at different levels of the text, and understanding the difference helps you know which ones your manuscript actually needs.

Developmental editing

Developmental editing addresses the manuscript's big-picture structure: the overall arc, pacing, character development, plot logic, argument structure (for nonfiction), and whether the book works on its intended level.

A developmental editor reads the manuscript and produces an editorial letter (typically several pages) and sometimes an annotated manuscript, identifying what's working, what isn't, and what specific changes would strengthen the work. They don't rewrite the book; they diagnose it and give you the tools to revise it.

When you need it: if you haven't had substantive outside feedback on your manuscript from a trusted, skilled reader, or if you received feedback that the structure or pacing isn't quite right. For a first book especially, developmental editing identifies fundamental issues that no amount of line editing or proofreading can fix.

When you might skip it: if you've received sustained feedback through writing groups, critique partners, or beta readers who identified and helped you address structural issues, and you're confident the manuscript is structurally sound.

Cost: developmental editing is the most expensive type because it involves the most judgment and the most reading-and-thinking time. Rates vary widely based on editor experience and manuscript length, but professional developmental editing for a full novel typically ranges from several hundred to several thousand dollars.

Line editing

Line editing works at the sentence level. A line editor looks at prose quality, rhythm, clarity, voice consistency, and how the writing accomplishes what it's trying to do on a sentence-by-sentence and paragraph-by-paragraph basis. This is different from developmental editing (which looks at structure) and from copyediting (which looks at correctness).

Line editing is most valuable when the manuscript is structurally sound but the writing itself needs refinement. If your developmental issues are resolved and you want the prose to be sharper, a line editor helps get there.

When you need it: when beta readers or you yourself notice that something feels "off" at the sentence level but the structure is intact. When prose quality is a priority for your genre or audience. When you're moving into a more literary category where prose style matters significantly to readers.

When you might skip it: if your prose is clean and your voice is consistent, or if you're working in a genre where plot, pacing, and story beats are more critical than prose style (certain thriller/adventure categories, for example). Some authors and editors combine developmental and line editing into a single pass, which is more efficient than doing them sequentially.

Cost: comparable to developmental editing or somewhat less, depending on the extent of work required.

Copyediting

Copyediting addresses correctness: grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, style consistency, timeline consistency, character name and detail consistency, and conformity to a style guide (usually Chicago Manual of Style for books). A copyeditor is not rewriting or improving your prose; they're catching errors and inconsistencies.

When you need it: for almost every book that's going to be published. Even authors who write clean prose introduce errors and inconsistencies across a full manuscript. A copyedited book will have fewer errors, period.

When you might skip it: genuinely, there are few good reasons to skip copyediting entirely. The cost is lower than developmental or line editing, and the benefit in terms of professional finish is clear. If budget is a hard constraint, this is the type of editing to prioritize when choosing one.

Cost: lower than developmental and line editing because it requires less creative judgment. For a standard novel, professional copyediting rates vary by editor experience and manuscript complexity.

Proofreading

Proofreading is the final pass for errors after the book is laid out in its final formatted form. Proofreading catches issues introduced during the formatting stage: incorrect page numbers, orphaned words at page breaks, header errors, spacing anomalies, and any typos introduced when text was reformatted.

Proofreading is not a substitute for copyediting; it's done after copyediting, on the final formatted file. If you've properly copyedited the manuscript before formatting, the proofreader's workload is lighter.

When you need it: before any print book goes to press. Print errors are expensive to fix after the fact (you need to upload a new interior file and wait for review). For ebooks, updating the file after publication is easier, so proofreading is less critical but still valuable.

When you might skip it: for ebooks where you're confident in your formatting process and you've done your own final pass before publishing. For print books, proofreading is strongly recommended.

How to find editors

Editorial communities and directories

Several professional organizations maintain editor directories:

  • Editorial Freelancers Association (EFA): maintains a directory of freelance editors across all types and genres, searchable by specialty
  • ACES: The Society for Editing: another professional organization with a directory
  • Reedsy: an author-focused marketplace that vets its editors and provides a project management interface between author and editor
  • Alliance of Independent Authors (ALLi): maintains a supplier directory that includes vetted editors

Genre communities and word of mouth

The most reliable referrals come from authors working in your genre who have had positive editing experiences. Genre-specific Facebook groups, author forums, and online communities often have active threads where authors share editor recommendations. An editor who works regularly in your genre understands its conventions, pacing expectations, and audience sensibilities better than an editor who primarily works in a different category.

Asking for a sample edit

A sample edit (typically the editor works through your first chapter or 5-10 pages) is standard practice for evaluating potential editors. Request sample edits from two or three candidates, and compare:

  • How thoroughly did they catch issues you're aware of?
  • Does their feedback align with your vision for the book, or does it push in a direction that doesn't fit?
  • Is their communication style clear and constructive?
  • How does their fee structure compare?

What to look for in an editor

Genre experience: an editor who works frequently in your genre (romance, fantasy, mystery, business nonfiction) understands what readers expect. This is more important than credentials alone.

Clear communication: the working relationship matters. Does the editor explain their feedback clearly? Do they respond promptly to queries? Are their contracts clear?

A track record: look at books they've edited or testimonials from authors they've worked with. Published authors in your genre who recommend an editor are a strong signal.

Contract clarity: a professional editor provides a written agreement that specifies the scope of work (what type of editing, how many rounds), turnaround time, and fee. Avoid working without a written agreement.

What editors cost

Rates vary by editor experience, type of editing, and manuscript length. Industry guidelines from the Editorial Freelancers Association list typical rates; as of recent years, these tend to fall in these ranges (per word or per hour):

TypeRough range (per word)What affects cost
Developmental editing$0.02 to $0.08+Manuscript complexity, genre, experience
Line editing$0.02 to $0.06+Same as above
Copyediting$0.01 to $0.04+Technical complexity, error density
Proofreading$0.01 to $0.02+Error density, formatted file format

A 90,000-word novel copyedited at $0.02/word would cost $1,800; at $0.035/word, $3,150. Developmental editing at $0.04/word on the same manuscript would be $3,600.

These are rough guidelines; actual quotes from individual editors vary significantly.

Working with editors effectively

Deliver a clean manuscript: before sending to a copyeditor or line editor, run your spell check and do your own pass for obvious errors. You're paying for the editor's professional judgment, not for them to fix things you'd catch yourself.

Communicate your goals: a good editor edits toward your vision for the book, not their own. Be clear in advance about genre expectations, stylistic choices (deliberate sentence fragments, unconventional dialogue attribution), and anything they should not change.

Read feedback before revising: sit with developmental feedback for a day or two before jumping into revisions. Initial reactions to critical feedback can be defensive; letting the notes settle helps you evaluate them more clearly.

Ask questions: if you don't understand why a change was suggested, ask. Editors generally welcome questions; understanding the reasoning helps you decide whether to accept a suggestion and improves your craft for future writing.

When self-editing is enough

Not every book needs every type of professional editing. Self-editing may be sufficient in some circumstances:

  • Experienced writers with strong craft: authors who have published multiple books and have developed a reliable self-editing process may not need developmental or line editing for every book
  • Fast-paced commercial fiction: certain genre categories (category romance, specific thriller subgenres) have less tolerance for line-level stylistic work; tight plot and good pacing may matter more
  • Short works: novellas and short stories have different expectations than full-length books

What self-editing can't fully replace: a professional copyeditor will catch more errors than you will in your own manuscript, because familiarity with your text makes you see what you meant rather than what you wrote. Even experienced, highly skilled writers benefit from external copyediting.

The editing investment in context

For a first book, the editing cost may be larger than any other single investment in the project. This is worth putting in perspective: editing is also the investment with the most direct impact on whether readers finish the book, recommend it, and leave positive reviews.

Books with structural problems get abandoned mid-read. Books with poor prose or line-level problems generate comments about the writing. Books with many errors generate one-star "didn't even bother to proofread" reviews. These outcomes damage the book's long-term performance regardless of its marketing investment.

Authors who build sustainable careers through indie publishing consistently emphasize editing as a non-negotiable investment rather than a line item to trim.

Developmental editing alternatives

If a professional developmental edit isn't currently within budget, several alternatives provide some of the same value:

Critique partners: a reciprocal arrangement where two authors read and give feedback on each other's work. Quality varies by the partner's experience and your genre match, but consistent critique partnerships can provide developmental-level insight over time. Genre-specific writing communities are the best place to find potential partners.

Writing groups: in-person or online groups where members share work for feedback. Similar caveats as critique partners; a writing group with members who read and write in your genre is more useful than a general group.

Manuscript assessment: some editors offer a manuscript assessment (or "editorial assessment") that's less intensive than full developmental editing: the editor reads the manuscript and delivers a written assessment letter but doesn't annotate the full manuscript. This costs less and can identify major structural issues.

Alpha readers: readers who read your manuscript before beta readers, specifically looking for early-stage structural issues. An experienced alpha reader who reads widely in your genre and gives honest, analytical feedback can identify the most significant issues before you continue developing the manuscript further.

These alternatives don't replace professional developmental editing for manuscripts with significant structural challenges, but for authors who've worked through substantial outside feedback and are primarily uncertain about one or two elements, they can be proportionate to the need.

Understanding the editor-author relationship

Editing is a professional relationship, and like most professional relationships, it works best when both parties are clear about expectations.

Respect for your creative vision: a good editor improves the book toward your goals, not their own preferences. When an editor suggests changes that feel wrong, you're allowed to say no. "Killed my darlings when the darlings were actually right" is a real risk; not every editorial suggestion is correct for your specific book and audience.

Understanding why: when you don't understand why an editor made a suggestion, ask for the reasoning. Understanding the editor's diagnosis helps you decide whether to accept the suggestion, find an alternative solution to the same problem, or conclude the editor's read is wrong in this case.

When to push back vs. when to trust: if an editor makes the same observation in multiple places across the manuscript, it's almost certainly a real pattern. A single suggestion you disagree with may simply be a matter of taste; a pattern of the same feedback means the pattern is real even if you prefer your approach.

Second opinions: if you receive developmental feedback you're genuinely uncertain about, a second editorial opinion (from another editor, a trusted critique partner, or experienced beta readers) can help you calibrate whether the concern is significant.

Frequently asked questions

Can I do a developmental edit myself?

You can get closer with structured self-editing using analytical tools and frameworks. But self-editing at the developmental level is limited because you're inside the book; you don't see what a reader sees experiencing it cold. Beta readers and critique partners can partially substitute, but a professional developmental editor brings systematic diagnostic experience that's hard to replicate.

How many rounds of editing do I need?

It depends on the editor's process and the manuscript's condition. Developmental editing typically results in one revision pass from the author, then the editor may do a lighter check pass. Copyediting typically includes one pass, then the author reviews and accepts or rejects tracked changes. Proofreading is typically one pass.

Should I hire different editors for different passes?

Often yes, particularly for developmental vs. copyediting. Fresh eyes at each stage catch different things. Some editors offer combined packages (line editing plus copyediting in a single pass); this can be efficient if you're working with a trusted editor.

The bottom line

Editing is the single most underinvested-in stage of most indie books. Understanding what each type of editing does, finding skilled editors through genre networks and professional directories, and investing in at least copyediting before publication is the most reliable way to distinguish professionally produced indie books from ones that feel rushed.

See our self-editing checklist guide for what to do before you hand the manuscript to a professional. And for the full indie publishing process, see our indie publishing 101 guide.

Ready to move your manuscript into formatting? Get started in LiberScript or see pricing.

Related guides

Ready to put this into practice?

LiberScript brings writing, critique, design, and export into one workspace, with no subscription.